WiMAX360

Everything you need to know about WiMAX

Raqueeb Hassan

Spectrum Assignment in 2.6 GHz Band, FDD or TDD? [Regulatory Issue]

Hello,

As we see in 3GPP standards, ITU also recommends that the 2.6GHz band to split into a mix of paired spectrum [FDD] - in which separate range of frequency are to be allocated for uplink and downlink channels - and unpaired spectrum (TDD) where they use a single range to have up and down time-slots. Most of the regulators (most notably, OfCom) are adopting “technology neutrality” for allocating the spectrum. Technologies like WiMAX, 3G and it’s evolutions such as HSPA or future LTE can have their own path in this 2.6 GHz band. According to the international best practices, and also ITU recommended on having 2.500-2.570 GHz and 2.620-2.690 to be used as paired bands for FDD mode and 2.570-2.690 to be used as unpaired band in the middle for TDD mode. In WRC-2000, ITU also suggested two more options for this extension band in 2.6 GHz, one starts with FDD channeling and other TDD channeling in the middle, as discussed. The last option suggested that the regulator should leave that option open to the individual operators to decide on any of these. Can that be left open to the operators?

Intel being the driving force of WiMAX ecosystem wants to see WiMAX and LTE to coexist. Intel strategist Maloney says that two standards should be harmonized because they are about "80 percent" similar but that WiMAX is a couple years ahead of LTE. He also said that customers will be confused by the competing 4G technologies. Maloney says that Intel is looking into ways to integrate the two technologies and it is technically possible for Intel to create a chip set that could be used for WiMAX and LTE. I need some fresh air ...

In the setting of CEPT 70-50-70MHz (FDD-TDD-FDD) band plan, the enlightened regulator might sets this up ... like 60-(50+10)-60-(10) allocation, or 50-(50+20)-50-20, where more WiMAX-suitable spectrum can be kept in the middle and end of the band with 120 MHz duplexing for LTE evolution. Will that be confusing? I guess, 2.3 and 3.4 GHz are natural TDD band. What is the prospect of FDD in 2.6 GHz band? The service providers might get the license for 15 years, what if they choose to offer more voice friendly applications (FDD) after 5 years, should they be able to use the spectrum if they are allowed to trade?

What should the regulators do? Should they specify this 2.6 GHz band to operate only in TDD mode or should they leave it open? What about WiMAX profiling on FDD? What WiMAX forum thinks about FDD?

Thanks in advance.

--
Raqueeb Hassan
http://wideangle.googlepages.com/

Tags: fdd, lte, regulatory, spectrum, tdd, technology

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Raqueeb,

The simple answer is: time. WiMAX Forum will develop FDD profiles for 802.16e-2005 systems and 3GPP will develop TDD support for LTE (both camps have discussed plans).

I believe that the CEPT recommendation provides the best middle-ground approach to allocation of a desirable mobile broadband band for IMT-Advanced protocols -- some for FDD and some for TDD.


Best regards,

-Jeff Orr
ORR Technology, LLC

Reply to This

Reply to This

RSS

Blog Posts

Simon

Interference Issues on "C" Band

Posted by Simon on September 29th, 2008 at 1:26pm — 4 Comments

Dan Callahan

Motorola announces WiMAX dongle for laptops

Posted by Dan Callahan on September 24th, 2008 at 2:23pm — 2 Comments

Paul Kapustka

It's Official: Xohm WiMax Launch Party is Oct. 8

Posted by Paul Kapustka on September 23rd, 2008 at 6:27pm — 2 Comments

Iratxo

Multi vendor CPEs and Massive IOTests

Posted by Iratxo on September 15th, 2008 at 12:03pm

Kobe Wadsworth

Great tool,sponsored by Wimax forum

Posted by Kobe Wadsworth on September 10th, 2008 at 12:06pm

Paul Kapustka

Boston, Philly, Dallas next for Sprint's WiMax

Posted by Paul Kapustka on September 2nd, 2008 at 1:16am

WiMAX360 Badge

© 2008   Created by Michael Wolleben

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service